Legal Opinion
People v. Merced
Criminal Court of the City of New York
Decided May 2, 1983PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Richard S. Lane, J.
Defendant moves to preclude his statements for the failure of the People to serve notice of intention to use within 15 days after arraignment as required by CPL 710.30. Defendant was arraigned on November 9, 1982. Notice was not given until service of the voluntary disclosure form in late January, 1983.
The People concede failure to comply with the statute but argue under the “good cause” exception contained therein. Factually the record reveals that defendant was given a desk appearance ticket for October 15, 1982 at the time of his arrest. He failed to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. BriggsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- People v. BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- People v. MarkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- People v. IveysAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
3Cited by6 opinions
- People v. SwantonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- People v. MaransAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- People v. WeeksCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1984
- In re E. C.New York Family Court · 1983
- In re Shannon G.New York Family Court · 1984
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.