Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Dunn v. Dorsey

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 19, 1898No. 2843PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Clallam County. — Hon. James G. MoOlinton, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Scott, C. J.

This is a proceeding in mandamus to compel payment of a warrant held by the relator issued by school district Ho. 7 of said county. Payment was resisted. on the ground that there were prior warrants first entitled to be paid more than sufficient to exhaust the funds. It appears that these prior warrants were originally invalid, as issued in excess of the limit without an authorization of the voters of the district, no election having been held for such purpose. But prior to the issuance of the warrant here in question they were validated…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Williams v. ShoudyWashington Supreme Court · 1895

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sipes v. Puget Sound Electric Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Wiseman v. EastmanWashington Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Continental Trust Co. v. Sabine Basket Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1928
  4. Pelly v. BehnemanWashington Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Westby v. Pacific Silicate Co., Ltd.Washington Supreme Court · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API