Legal Opinion
Alamillo v. BNSF Railway Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 25, 2017No. 15-56091PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FEINERMAN, District Judge:
Plaintiff-Appellant Antonio Alamillo filed this suit against Defendant-Appellee BNSF Railway Company (BNSF), claiming that it terminated him from his job as a locomotive -engineer in violation of the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA), Cal. Gov.- Code § 12940 et seq. The district court granted summary judgment to BNSF, and we affirm.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
In 2012, Alamillo worked as a locomotive engineer for BNSF. Due to his seniority, he had the choice to work either (1) a five-day-per-week schedule with regular hours or (2) on the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Carolyn Humphrey v. Memorial Hospitals AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Harris v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
- Scotch v. Art Institute of California-Orange County, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2009
- Nadaf-Rahrov v. the Neiman Marcus Group, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2008
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Adams v. Maricopa, County ofDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2020
- Chandler v. DeJoyDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2024
- Fitzgerald v. Freightliner of Arizona LLCDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2019
- Flores v. DISH Network LLCDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2021
- Fulfer v. WinCo Holdings, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2019
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.