Legal Opinion

Freeman v. Rahm

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1881No. 7,458PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from a judgment for the defendant and an order denying a new trial in the Superior Court of Yolo County. Büsh, J.

1Opinion of the Court

Myrick, J.:

This action was brought to restrain the defendant as sheriff from proceeding to sell certain real estate on an execution against J. R. Campbell. One W. J. Campbell died seised of real estate, to an undivided "eighteenth of which said J. R. Campbell became entitled by succession. On the 11th of December, 1877, while the estate of W. J. Campbell was in process of administration, said J. R. Campbell sold to plaintiff all his interest in the estate of said W. J. Campbell, deceased, received the full amount of the purchase money therefor, and executed and delivered to plaintiff a full…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Crew v. PrattCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Cooley v. Miller & LuxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Martinovich v. MarsicanoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Chever v. Ching Hong PoyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Barnard v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API