Legal Opinion
Noble v. State
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided February 13, 1995No. CR 94-572PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Jack Holt, Jr., Chief Justice.
The present appeal is from a denial of post-conviction relief pursuant to Ark. R. Crim. R 37.1 in a case previously entertained on appeal and dismissed by this court in Noble v. State, 314 Ark. 240, 862 S.W.2d 234 (1993). In that appeal, we held that the appellant, Sherman Noble, who had entered a conditional guilty plea to a capital-felony murder charge, had failed to adhere to the requirements of Ark. R. Crim. P. 24.3(b) regarding both the consent of the trial court and the prosecutor and the reservation in writing of his right to appeal.
In the present Rule 37…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Moran v. BurbineSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Evitts v. LuceySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Brewer v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- State v. NewellArizona Supreme Court · 2006
- Grillot v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
- Bowen v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
- Misskelley v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
- Wright v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.