Crow v. . Morgan
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Clarkson, J.(1) We think the homestead exemption was not properly laid off. Constitution of N. C., Art. X, sec. 2, is as follows: “Every homestead, and the dwellings and buildings used therewith, not exceeding in value one thousand dollars, to be_ selected by the owner thereof, or in lieu thereof, at the option of the owner, any lot in a city, town, or village, with the dwelling and buildings used thereon, owned and occupied by any resident of this State, and not exceeding the value of one thousand dollars, shall be exempt from sale under execution or other final process obtained on any debt.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Cheek v. . WaldenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
- Duplin County v. . HarrellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
- Farris v. . HendricksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
- Lockhart v. . BearSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
- Befarrah v. Spell.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Cleve v. . AdamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Household Finance Corp. v. EllisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
- Miller v. . LittleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937