Legal Opinion

Cheek v. . Walden

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 6, 1928PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClabicsoN, J.

The plaintiff, a resident of the State, owns certain real property. Judgments are taken by defendants against him and duly docketed on the judgment docket of the Superior Court of the county in which the land is situate, which became a lien on his real property, under 0. S., 614. Thereafter he and his wife, in accordance with law, made a mortgage on the land. No homestead has heretofore been allotted to plaintiff. Can plaintiff claim a homestead in the equity of redemption? We think so.

Const, of N. C., Art. X, sec. 2, is as follows: “Every homestead, and the dwellings and buildings used…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Rodman v. Robinson.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  2. Thurber. Whyland & Co. v. LaRoqueSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  3. Chadbourn Sash, Door & Blind Co. v. ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
  4. Mayho and Parker v. . CottonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1873
  5. Burton v. . SpiersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1882

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Cleve v. . AdamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  2. Farris v. . HendricksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  3. Stokes v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  4. Pence v. PriceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  5. Pence v. . PriceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API