Commonwealth v. Santarelli

OLSZEWSKI, Judge:

This appeal follows each man’s convictions on counts of possession of a Schedule I controlled substance, to wit, marijuana,1 possession with intent to deliver,2 and criminal conspiracy.3 The cases were consolidated for trial and again for appeal. We address in turn the claims of each appellant.

*593 William, A. Guinther

Guinther argues: (1) insufficient evidence introduced by the Commonwealth against Guinther mandates reversal and discharge; (2) the trial court erred by refusing to instruct the jury on the offense of possession of less than 30 grams of marijuana; and (3)…