Legal Opinion
Slade v. Slade
Connecticut Superior Court
Decided October 19, 1936No. File #52610PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCornell, J.
The question raised by the instant motion concerns the interpretation to be given the phrase, “It (the Superior Court) may grant a divorce in any case in which both the husband and wife are residents of this state” as it is conjoined with, “if either shall have been incurably insane and shall have been confined in a hospital or asylum for the insane for at least five years next preceding the date of the complaint in such action”. Cum. Supp., Gen Stat., 1931-1935, #1597c.
It arises because the evidence shows that the plaintiff husband and defendant wife were domiciled in Connecticut in the…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Kelsey v. GreenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1897
- McDonald v. Hartford Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
- Clegg v. BishopSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
- Gildersleeve v. GildersleeveSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1914
- Mills v. MillsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Baumann v. Darhogopian, No. Cv 90 0267203 S (May 20, 1991)Connecticut Superior Court · 1991
- Discepolo v. Johnson, No. 45132 (Nov. 25, 1991)Connecticut Superior Court · 1991
- Pena-Walzak v. Johnson, No. 36 49 37 (Jul. 30, 1990)Connecticut Superior Court · 1990