Legal Opinion

Florida Bar v. Heller

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided May 19, 1971No. 39903PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

We have for review the Referee’s report recommending that the Respondent, George M. Heller, be disbarred. Rule 11.09, Integration Rule of The Florida Bar, 32 F.S.A.

Respondent Heller had performed services for Pan American Surety Company, as one of its attorneys. By an order dated December 28, 1961, entered in receivership proceedings brought by the State Treasurer against Pan American, all attorneys representing the insurer were discharged. Subsequently, the Receiver learned that Respondent Heller had nevertheless continued to represent the insurance company in the appeal of the case of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. The Florida Bar v. PahulesSupreme Court of Florida · 1970
  2. Heller v. State ex rel. LarsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
  3. Florida Bar v. BurtonSupreme Court of Florida · 1969
  4. Florida Bar v. ChamplinSupreme Court of Florida · 1969

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Country Manors Ass'n, Inc. v. Master Antenna Systems, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  2. Adams, George, Lee, Schulte, & Ward, P. A., Cross v. Westinghouse Electric Corporation, CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
  3. Adams, George, Lee, Schulte, & Ward, P. A., Cross v. Westinghouse Electric Corporation, CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
  4. Adams, George, Lee, Schulte, & Ward, P. A., Cross v. Westinghouse Electric Corporation, CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API