Legal Opinion

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Wittmaack

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 11, 1987PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

FLAHERTY, Justice.

This is a disciplinary case in which various charges of misconduct have been brought against a Pennsylvania attorney. Charge I concerns a real estate transaction in which Attorney Wittmaack failed to inform his clients, whom he represented in the matter of securing a construction mortgage, that he held a financial interest in and was counsel for a construction company which would receive the proceeds of the mortgage. Charge I also concerns Mr. Wittmaack’s forgery of a document purporting to be signed by his clients in which the clients are said to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. KellerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. LucariniSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Commonwealth v. GeeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  4. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. GrigsbySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ChesterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  2. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. BraunSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  3. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. SternSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Iowa Supreme Court Board of Professional Ethics & Conduct v. WagnerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1999
  5. Commonwealth v. A.R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API