Legal Opinion
In Re Sheridan
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 26, 1964No. Crim. 10236PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KINCAID, J. pro tem. *
Petitioners have applied for a writ of habeas corpus following the entry of a plea of guilty by each of them to a complaint charging them with a violation of section 647a, subdivision (1), of the Penal Code, a misdemeanor (annoying or molesting children under the age of 18) in four counts. A similar application was heretofore filed in the superior court and, after hearing, denied. An order to show cause was issued by us for the purpose of inquiring into the validity of the sentences imposed as to each of the petitioners.
An answer to the order to show cause, with points…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Neal v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- People v. KnowlesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- People v. MajorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
- In Re JinglesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- People v. BrannonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- In Re JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- United States v. Jose Alfredo Pallares-GalanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Nino v. Gladys R.California Supreme Court · 1970
- Mills v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- People v. LopezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.