Legal Opinion

In Re McConnell

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided March 8, 1930PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

One Arthur McConnell died, leaving a last will and testament which has been admitted to probate, wherein and whereby he bequeathed and devised to his widow, the respondent, all of his property. He appointed the respondent and his son James executors and trustees in said will. Thereafter, James died and by his will bequeathed and devised to his widow, the appellant, all his property. In the will of Arthur, he directed the payment of all his just debts "and funeral expenses" and authorized a monument for his grave, to cost not more than $1,500. Immediately after the death of Arthur, James and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re FulperNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1926
  2. In re the Alleged Will of CassidyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1912

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Newberry v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1951
  2. Newberry v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API