Legal Opinion

In re the Alleged Will of Cassidy

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided February 27, 1912PublishedCited by 6 opinions

On aqrpeal from Sussex orphans court.

1Opinion of the Court

Pitney, Ordinary.

Application was made to the orphans court by Samuel Oassidy, Jr., setting- up that John Cassidy, deceased, had left a paper-writing purporting to be his last will and testament, of which the petitioner was the sole executor; that at the time of John Cassidy’s death the paper-writing was in existence, and that since that time it had been lost. The petitioner prayed that the orphans court, upon proper proof being made of the contents of the paper-writing, would admit it to probate and issu'e letters testamentary thereon to the petitioner. The orphans court dismissed this…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bugbee v. Van CleveNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1926
  2. In re Hathorn's WillNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1916
  3. In Re FischerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1935
  4. In Re McConnellNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1930
  5. In Re SchultzNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1926

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API