Legal Opinion

Barnett v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided February 9, 2006No. 085, 2005Published

1Opinion of the Court

RIDGELY, Justice.

Defendant-Appellant, Vincent Barnett, was convicted by a Superior Court jury of Rape First Degree (two counts), Rape Fourth Degree, Unlawful Sexual Contact Second Degree (two counts), and Unlawful Sexual Contact Third Degree. He was sentenced to forty years in prison suspended after thirty years minimum mandatory for decreasing levels of probation. In this appeal Barnett argues that the Superior Court abused its discretion by admitting evidence of several uncharged sexual offenses against the alleged victim, including three uncharged Class A felonies, during the State’s case…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Getz v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1988
  3. Van Arsdall v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1987
  4. Milligan v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2000
  5. Kendall v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1999

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API