Legal Opinion

McNeill v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 12, 1932PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rosenberry, C .J.

The findings of fact and conclusions of law cover twenty-five pages of the printed case and no useful purpose would be served by setting them out in full. In addition to the facts already stated, the court found that the quitclaim deed given by Mr. Spratt to the plaintiff was given freely and voluntarily and that no false statement or pretenses were used to obtain the same from Mr. Spratt. In its opinion the court said:

“There can, of course, be no question'what McNeill’s intentions were in 1915 with respect to the railway company’s property. He took a quitclaim deed from…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Guse v. FlohrWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Bradley v. SeldenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lindokken v. PaulsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Shepard v. GilbertWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Prince v. Charles Ilfeld CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Meiers v. WangWisconsin Supreme Court · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API