Legal Opinion
Calnev Pipe Line Co. v. City of Colton
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 16, 1964No. Civ. No. 7177PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BROWN (R. M.), J.*
This appeal involves an attack upon the validity of annexation proceedings conducted by the City of Colton and known as West Colton Annexation No. 16. The decision in a companion case, City of Colton v. City of Rialto, ante, p. 174 [40 Cal.Rptr. 766] 4 Civil No. 7176, is filed concurrently herewith.
Briefly stated, we have found that the Rialto Annexation No. 52 was unlawful in its inception, that a majority protest had been filed in its annexation and that ordinance No. 457 which purported to approve said annexation was invalidly adopted and was void. Therefore, the City of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hunter v. City of PittsburghSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- American Distilling Co. v. City Council of SausalitoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- People Ex Rel. Peck v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- People Ex Rel. Averna v. City of Palm SpringsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- People Ex Rel. Mosk v. City of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- City of Santa Cruz v. Local Agency Formation CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- Ferrini v. City of San Luis ObispoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Bookout v. Local Agency Formation CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Ferrini v. City of San Luis ObispoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983