Legal Opinion

State v. Seagraves

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 15, 1965No. 671PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Cueiam.

Upon a hearing to determine whether or not probation should be revoked, and a sentence previously suspended should be activated, all that is required is that the evidence be such as reasonably to satisfy the judge, in the exercise of his sound discretion, that the defendant has violated a valid condition upon which the sentence was so suspended. State v. Coffey, 255 N.C. 293, 121 S.E. 2d 736; State v. Robinson, 248 N.C. 282, 103 S.E. 2d 376; State v. Millner, 240 N.C. 602, 83 S.E. 2d 546. However, the burden of proof is upon the State to show that the defendant has violated one of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  2. State v. CoffeySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  3. State v. MillnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  4. State v. McBrideSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. CaudleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  2. State v. BraswellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  3. State v. TennantCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  4. State v. AlstonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  5. State v. CunninghamCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API