Legal Opinion

Rooney v. Rooney

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided February 15, 1896PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Einal healing on pleadings and proofs in open court.

1Opinion of the Court

Pitney, V. C.

The object of this suit is to procure a judicial declaration by this court that a contract and ceremony of marriage entered into between the parties was a nullity by reason of the prior hymeneal contract of the complainant with another woman, who was his living and lawful wife at the time of the later contract.

The bill alleges complainant’s marriage with one Mary Tole, in Richmond, Virginia, May 18th, 1862, and again with the defendant, Helen E. Barry, on July 14th, 1894, at which time Mary Tole was living. The bill was filed December 4th, 1894.

The answer puts complainant upon…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Patterson v. GainesSupreme Court of the United States · 1848
  2. Fuller v. FullerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1885
  3. Summerlin v. LivingstonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1860

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Bowman v. LittleCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1905
  2. Sturm v. SturmNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1932
  3. Brown v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1947
  4. Hansen v. FredoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1973
  5. Loeb v. LoebNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1965

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API