Legal Opinion
United States v. Nelson
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 24, 2005No. 04 CR. 0021(VM)PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
MARRERO, District Judge.
The United States Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York (the “Government”) filed a motion in limine by letter dated March 8, 2005 to preclude cross-examination at trial of two potential Government witnesses, Detectives Robert Rodriguez (“Rodriguez”) and Kevin Spell-man (“Spellman”), and to exclude, pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 608(b), any extrinsic evidence of certain prior conduct by those witnesses. Nelson replied by letter dated March 8, 2005 and the Government responded to Nelson’s reply by letter dated the same day.
The…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Napue v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Beech Aircraft Corp. v. RaineySupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- United States v. Sean Lamont CromerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Chevron Corp. v. DonzigerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- United States v. CedenoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
- United States v. Cuadrado (Cedeño)Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
- United States v. SteeleDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2016
- United States v. DupreeDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2011
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.