Kersten v. Van Grack, Axelson & Williamowsky, P.C.
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
HARRELL, Judge.
This appeal from a summary judgment proceeding in the Circuit Court for Montgomery County raises the issue of whether a law firm may be held vicariously liable for the alleged bad acts of a private process server. The circuit court (Cave, J.) ruled that appellee, Van Grack, Axelson & Williamowsky, P.C., neither possessed nor exercised that degree of control over the private process server which would give rise to vicarious liability. We find no error and affirm.
Facts
The events leading up to this appeal are undisputed and may be summarized briefly. Appellee was retained by…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Rowley v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
- Deford v. State ex rel. KeyserCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1869
- Keitz v. National Paving & Contracting Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1957
- Whitehead v. Safway Steel Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
- Brady v. Ralph Parsons Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Kleeman v. RheingoldNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Post v. BregmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
- Schramm v. FosterDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2004
- Brooks v. Euclid Systems Corp.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2003
- Danner v. International Freight Systems of Washington, LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2012
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.