Legal Opinion

Brindle v. Anglin

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 1965No. 30,804PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Per curiam

The opinion of the Appellate Court fails to consider a primary issue in the case, presented by appellees’ motion to dismiss. Therefore, transfer of the case' is granted, under Rule 2-23 (4) (a) of this court.

The motion to dismiss is predicated upon the fact that the Chief Justice of the Appellate Court granted a second extension of time in which to file transcript and assignment of errors, such second petition having been filed 13 days after the expiration of the time previously granted by the Appellate Court on the first petition for extension of time.

The motion to dismiss was denied pending…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dawson v. Wright, Mayor, Etc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Meier v. Social Security AdministrationIndiana Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Taylor v. MeskimenIndiana Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Higginson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Bowers v. ThornburgIndiana Supreme Court · 1961

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Duke v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Wadkins v. ThorntonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1972
  3. Eggers v. WrightIndiana Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Sampson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1968
  5. State v. FoyIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API