Legal Opinion
United States v. Reul
United States Court of International Trade
Decided February 8, 1991No. Court No. 85-04-00562Published
1Opinion of the Court
DiCarlo, Judge:
St. Paul moves pursuant to Rule 59 of the Rules of this Court for rehearing of United States v. Reul & St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co., 14 CIT 661, Slip Op. 90-92 (Sept. 12, 1990). The Court denies the motion.
Background
Dr. Reul (importer) imported two automobiles from Italy. The first was entered under informal entry on June 14,1977 and the second was entered under informal entry on November 7, 1978. See 19 C.F.R. § 159.10(a)(1) (for regulations concerning informal entry). At the time of entry, the importer represented to Customs that neither vehicle was in compliance with…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Brookside Veneers, Ltd. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- United States v. Utex International Inc., and Sentry Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- United States v. Imperial Food Imports, and American Motorists Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Belfont Sales Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988
- RSI (India) Pvt., Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.