Legal Opinion

Orm v. State

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided July 28, 1992No. 77594PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HANSEN, Vice-Chief Judge:

Patsy Orm (Appellant), seeks review of the trial court’s order terminating her parental rights. We find the trial court’s determination constitutionally infirm for lack of sufficient notice and reverse.

Our Supreme Court has held parents have a fundamental, constitutionally protected interest in the “continuity of legal bond with their children”. Matter of Delaney, 617 P.2d 886 (Okla.1980). Addressing the constitutional requirement for due process in Matter of C.G., 637 P.2d 66 (Okla.1981), the Supreme Court found:

Due process inexorably commands notice which…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Matter of DelaneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
  2. Matter of A.D.B.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Department of Human Services v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2015
  2. State v. AlbertCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2012
  3. M.D.R. v. StateCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2002
  4. Matter of BMOCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1992
  5. IN THE MATTER OF T.T.S.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2015

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API