Legal Opinion

Chadwick v. Earhart

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1884PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from Marion County.

1Opinion of the Court

By tlie Court,

Waldo, C. J.:

Two questions are submitted in this case. The first and principal one is, whether, when, under section 8 of article 5 of the constitution of Oregon, the duties of the office of governor devolve upon the secretary of state, he has a right to the salary of the office. Second. If this question be answered in the affirmative, whether he shall continue to perform the duties of the office for the remainder of the term of the outgoing governor, or shall he perform those duties only so long as he shall continue to be secretary of state.

“ In case of the removal of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Van Guysling v. . Van KurenNew York Court of Appeals · 1866
  2. Stasch v. Underwater Works, Inc.Superior Court of Delaware · 1960
  3. City of Portland v. DennyOregon Supreme Court · 1874

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Murphy v. McBrideWashington Supreme Court · 1902
  2. State ex rel. Chatterton v. GrantWyoming Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Futrell v. OldhamSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1913
  4. Olcott v. HoffOregon Supreme Court · 1919
  5. State v. OlcottOregon Supreme Court · 1920

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API