Legal Opinion

Andrew Owens v. Frank A. Eyman, Warden

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 18, 1970No. 25149PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

Owens is an Arizona state prisoner. He appeals from an order denying his application for habeas corpus relief.

After his first state court trial resulted in jury disagreement and a mistrial, Owens was again tried for the charged offense, robbery, and, this time, convicted. At the second trial the state introduced, over objection, the reporter’s transcript of the testimony of a witness who had testified for the prosecution during the first trial. Owens contends that this violated his Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment rights of confrontation and cross-examination.

When an unavailable witness has…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Townsend v. SainSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Barber v. PageSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. State v. OwensArizona Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Jack Rainsberger v. Jack Fogliani, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States of America Ex Rel. William C. Stubbs v. Vincent R. Mancusi, Warden of Attica Correctional FacilityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
  2. United States v. Clinton Harless, AKA Stephen Lisnak, AKA Alexander DyleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
  3. Rawlins v. CravenDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1971
  4. State v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
  5. United States of America Ex Rel. William C. Stubbs v. Vincent R. Mancusi, Warden of Attica Correctional FacilityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API