Legal Opinion

Albrecht v. Lignoski

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 4, 1912Published

Appeal from District Court, Dimmit County; J. F. Mullally, Judge. Action between C. A. Albrecht and others and Charles Lignoski. From a judgment in favor of Lignoski, Albrecht and others appeal. On motion to strike the statement of faets.

1Opinion of the CourtMoursund, J.

Pursuant to appellee’s motion to strike out the statement of faets filed in this cause, we have examined the same, and find that it does not comply with the rules, in that much of it consists of questions and answers, interspersed with objections by counsel and rulings by the court. About 6 pages contain documentary evidence. Out of the remaining 53 pages, over 30 contain questions and answers, and about 20 consist entirely of questions and answers, objections and rulings, apparently copied from the stenographer’s transcript. About 2 pages are entirely taken up by a single controversy between…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Heidenheimer v. TannenbaumCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1900
  2. Albers v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912
  3. Redmond v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API