Hauge v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the District of Oregon; Charles E- Wolverton, Judge. Criminal prosecution by the United States against Olaf Hauge. Judgment of conviction, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
HUNT, Circuit Judge.
Hauge was convicted of having sworn falsely in a proceeding under the laws relating to the naturalization of aliens, and brings writ of error. Section 80, Penal Code (Comp. St. § 10248). The indictment charged that in June, 1920, in the District Court of the United States, in Oregon, Hauge took an oath to answer truthfully all questions which might be put to him touching his qualifications for admission to become a citizen of the United States, and that while under oath he willfully and feloniously falsely swore that about January 9, 1918, at the time he filed his…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- O'Hara v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1904
- Chapa v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1919
- In re TomarchioDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1920
- Adamson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1910
- In re SilberschutzDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1920
3Cited by11 opinions
- Richard E. Loux and Neil Conrad Wallen v. United States of America, Vertis James Barrett, Arthur St. Peter Andharold Oscar Thomas v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
- Clifford Jones v. Honorable Oliver Gasch, Judge of the United States District Court for Thedistrict of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
- Burgman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951
- Milton M. Levin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1965
- United States v. BaysekCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1954
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.