Legal Opinion

Hastie v. Burrage

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 11, 1904No. 13,711PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error from Sumner district court; C. L. Swarts, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Cunningham, J.:

This was an action on a note and for the foreclosure of a mortgage given to secure the same. The petition nowhere in its caption or body *561recited “the name of the court and the county in ■which the action is brought,” as provided in section 87 of the code of civil procedure (Gen. Stat. 1901, § 4521). It was, however, indorsed upon the outside “No. 9019, district court, Sumner county, Kansas,” and was filed in that court.- Upon a prseeipe properly entitled, a summons was issued and duly served on the defendants. Conceiving that this…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Good v. EhrlichSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903
  2. Butcher v. Bank of BrownsvilleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1863
  3. Jackson v. LongwellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1901
  4. Hamilton v. CoffinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1891
  5. Merrill v. GrinnellNew York Supreme Court · 1854

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Arthur & Co. v. BurkeWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Jarnagin v. DitusSupreme Court of Kansas · 1967
  3. State v. BlandSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
  4. Larsen v. DukeOregon Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Flanagan v. OxleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API