Brown v. Conrad
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
CONOVER, Presiding Judge.
Defendant-Appellant Byron Brown (Brown) appeals an order granting a new trial upon Plaintiff’s-Appellee’s Ernest and Mary Conrad’s (Conrads) motion to correct error. Ind.Rules of Procedure, Trial Rule 59(J)(7).
Brown presents two issues:
1. did the trial court err by vacating a judgment in his favor; and
2. did the trial court err by granting a new trial on the issue of damages?
On November 9, 1985, Brown drove his car into the rear of Ernest Conrad’s car injuring him. The Conrads sued, alleging Brown was negligent and his negligence caused Ernest severe and permanent…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Miller v. GrieselIndiana Supreme Court · 1974
- Huff v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1977
- Memorial Hospital of South Bend, Inc. v. ScottIndiana Supreme Court · 1973
- Bridgewater v. Economy Engineering Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1985
- Coffel v. PerryIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- INS Investigations Bureau, Inc. v. LeeIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
- Keith v. MendusIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996
- State v. McKenzieIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
- Sherman v. KlubaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000
- Neher v. HobbsIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.