Luck v. Employment Security Commission
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN (Harry C.), Judge.
The only question presented by this appeal is whether Luck’s appeal was timely. It appears that this is a case of first impression in North Carolina. The pertinent provisions of N.C.G.S. 126-35 and 126-38 are:
§ 126-35.....Any employee appealing any decision or State Personnel Act shall be discharged, suspended, or reduced in pay or position, except for just cause. In cases of such disciplinary action, the employee shall, before the action is taken, be furnished with a statement in writing setting forth . . . the employee’s appeal rights. The employee shall be…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Faulkner v. North Carolina Department of CorrectionsDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1977
- Jones v. Department of Human ResourcesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
3Cited by7 opinions
- Leiphart v. North Carolina School of the ArtsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- Employment Security Commission v. WellsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
- Nix v. Department of AdministrationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
- Jordan v. North Carolina Department of Transportation, Division of Motor VehiclesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
- Meyers v. Department of Human ResourcesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.