Legal Opinion

Duhaime v. Treasurer

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided November 19, 1993No. 92-316PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDooley, J.

Plaintiff, Robert Duhaime, appeals from a declaratory judgment holding that he is not entitled to receive additional retirement benefits from the Vermont Employees Retirement System, 3 V.S.A. §§ 455-495, for financially supporting his stepchild. He argues that 3 V.S.A. § 461(c)(2) requires the Treasurer to pay him an extra ten percent of his “average final compensation” on account of his dependent stepson. He also argues that if he is not entitled to additional compensation under the statute, the statute violates his rights *158under the Equal Protection Clause of the United States Constitution…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Burlington Electric Department v. Vermont Department of TaxesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1990
  2. In Re Taft Corners Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1993
  3. Vincent v. Vermont State Retirement BoardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1987
  4. In Re Southview AssociatesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1989
  5. Ainsworth v. AinsworthSupreme Court of Vermont · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Becky A. Baldauf and Estate of Ronald Baldauf v. Vermont State TreasurerSupreme Court of Vermont · 2021
  2. Jacobs v. State Teachers' Retirement SystemSupreme Court of Vermont · 2002
  3. Viles v. Vermont State CollegesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API