United States v. Gil
District Court, W.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
LAWRENCE J. VILARDO, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
In United States v. Joyner , 313 F.3d 40, 48 (2d Cir. 2002), the Second Circuit said *443in dicta that an indictment charging a continuing criminal enterprise ("CCE") offense "was flawed in that it did not identify with specificity the three violations necessary to form a CCE offense." But earlier that same year, in United States v. Flaharty , 295 F.3d 182, 197 (2d Cir. 2002), the Second Circuit observed that "we have held that an indictment that does not identify which of many alleged felonies constituted the [CCE] series is not thereby…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. John WalshCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Leonardo R. Santana-Madera v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- United States v. FlahartyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- Peter Monsanto v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
- United States v. JoynerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.