Legal Opinion

United States v. Gil

District Court, W.D. New York

Decided June 20, 2018No. 15–CR–143Published

1Opinion of the Court

LAWRENCE J. VILARDO, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

In United States v. Joyner , 313 F.3d 40, 48 (2d Cir. 2002), the Second Circuit said *443in dicta that an indictment charging a continuing criminal enterprise ("CCE") offense "was flawed in that it did not identify with specificity the three violations necessary to form a CCE offense." But earlier that same year, in United States v. Flaharty , 295 F.3d 182, 197 (2d Cir. 2002), the Second Circuit observed that "we have held that an indictment that does not identify which of many alleged felonies constituted the [CCE] series is not thereby…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. John WalshCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
  2. Leonardo R. Santana-Madera v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
  3. United States v. FlahartyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
  4. Peter Monsanto v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
  5. United States v. JoynerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API