Legal Opinion

Peter Monsanto v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided October 31, 2003No. 01-2286PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CALABRESI, Circuit Judge.

Petitioner-Appellant Peter Monsanto appeals from a decision of the United States District Court for the Southern Dis trict of New York (Ward, J.) dismissing his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Appellant contends 1) that the district court was wrong to conclude that an error in the court’s jury instruction at Monsanto’s trial was harmless, and 2) that Monsanto’s conviction for two offenses violates his constitutional right to be free from double jeopardy. We affirm.

I. Background

Appellant was charged, inter alia, with (a) participating in a pattern of racketeering…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  4. Richardson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  5. Rutledge v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Skoros v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
  2. United States v. Sean CarrCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
  3. John Fountain, Also Known as Chick v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
  4. United States ex rel. Wood v. Allergan, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2017
  5. United States v. NeedhamCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API