Legal Opinion
Gibson v. County of Riverside
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 31, 1997No. 96-56369PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TROTT, Circuit Judge:
OVERVIEW
This appeal arises from an action brought by a family with minor children challenging Riverside County, California’s senior citizen zoning ordinances. The district court granted (1) plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment, and (2) declaratory and injunctive relief permanently enjoining the County from enforcing its age-based zoning laws. In so doing, the district court concluded that California Government Code § 65008(a)(1), 1994 legislation that broadly outlawed certain forms of discrimination in connection with the use and enjoyment of real property,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Premier Communications Network, Inc. v. FuentesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Mastro v. WittCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
3Cited by8 opinions
- Surfvivor Media, Inc. Peter S. Deptula v. Survivor Productions CBS Broadcasting Inc. CBS Worldwide, Inc. Wpc Brands, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Feature Realty, Inc. v. City of SpokaneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Cacique, Inc. v. Robert Reiser & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Gibson v. County of RiversideDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2002
- 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 13, 97 Daily Journal D.A.R. 27 Douglas Arnold Gibson, by His Guardian Ad Litem Douglas Arnold Gibson, Individually and on Behalf of Individuals Similarly Situated and the General Public Diane Marie Gibson, by Her Guardian Ad Litem Douglas Arnold Gibson, Individually and on Behalf of Individuals Similarly Situated and the General Public Dustin Gibson, by His Guardian Ad Litem Douglas Arnold Gibson, Individually and on Behalf of Individuals Similarly Situated and the General Public Daniel Gibson, by His Guardian Ad Litem Douglas Arnold Gibson, Individually and on Behalf of Individuals Similarly Situated and the General Public James Dittmar, Individually and on Behalf of Individuals Similarly Situated and the General Public v. County of Riverside Larry Parrish, Individually and in His Official Capacity as Chief Administrative Officer Thomas Ingram, Individually and in His Official Capacity as Director of Building and Safety Scott Barber, Individually and in His Capacity as Supervising Code Enforcement Officer Joseph Tronti, Individually and in His Capacity as Senior Code Enforcement OfficerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.