Clark v. Daniel Morine Construction Co.
Idaho Supreme Court
1DissentBistline, Justice
In my opinion the majority opinion of the Court does an injustice to the claimant by inferring, without holding, that her deceased husband, Leslie Clark, was not the employee of Daniel Morine Construction Company, which relationship was by the Commission determined to exist, and the validity of which determination was not made an issue by any of the parties on the appeal to this Court. I disagree that the outcome of claimant’s case should hinge on a factual determination as to whether or not the river road to Headquarters, Idaho, presents any “peculiar difficulty for a driver.” The issue of…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Cudahy Packing Co. Of Nebraska v. ParramoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. CardilloCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
- Hinojosa v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Smith v. University of IdahoIdaho Supreme Court · 1946
- Walker v. HydeIdaho Supreme Court · 1927
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.