Legal Opinion
Michael Shechtman v. U.S. Xpress Inc., U.S. Xpress Leasing, and Quami Wallen
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided January 22, 2026No. 4:23-cv-01156Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA MICHAEL SHECHTMAN, No. 4:23-CV-01156 Plaintiff, (Chief Judge Brann) v. U.S. XPRESS INC., U.S. XPRESS LEASING, and QUAMI WALLEN, Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION JANUARY 22, 2026 I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Michael Shechtman (“Plaintiff”) filed a four-count complaint against Defendants U.S. Xpress Inc. (“U.S. Xpress”), U.S. Xpress Leasing (“Xpress Leasing”), and Quami Wallen (“Wallen”) (collectively, “Defendants”).1 Plaintiff brought a direct negligence claim against Wallen, both direct and vicarious liability negligence…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Improvement Company v. MunsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Feld v. MerriamSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- EBC, Inc. v. Clark Building System, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.