Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Fishel v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 11, 1972No. Appeal No. 384 C.D. 1972PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Rogers,

Sears, Roebuck & Company here appeals from a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Board affirming a referee’s award of benefits to Richard Fishel.

Sears sold aluminum awnings from its store in Harrisburg to one Anna Driver, the owner of an apartment house in that city. The contract of sale provided that Sears would arrange for installation of the awnings and the §1(509 purchase price included the cost of installation. One Ronicky Johnson had undertaken to install various items sold by gears, including aluminum awnings. His written contract with Sears provided that each…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. McDonald v. Levinson Steel Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  2. Rich Hill Coal Company v. BashoreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  3. Qualp v. James Stewart Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  4. Gallivan v. Wark Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  5. Harry W. Boettger v. The Babcock & Wilcox CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1957

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Dougherty v. Conduit & Foundation Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  2. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board v. American Mutual Liability InsuranceCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. Wright Demolition & Excavating Co. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Perma-Lite of Pennsylvania, Inc. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. Williams v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API