Legal Opinion
NCR Corp. v. Palm, Inc.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided July 12, 2002No. Civ.A.01-169-RRMPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
THYNGE, United States Magistrate Judge
This is a patent infringement case. Plaintiff NCR Corporation is a Maryland corporation with its principal place of business in Dayton, Ohio. Defendants Handspring Corporation and Palm Corporation are Delaware corporations, and have their principal places of business in Santa Clara, California and Mountain View, California, respectively.
NCR is the owner of U.S. Patent. Nos. 4,634,845 (“the ’845 patent”) and 4,689,478 (“the ’478 patent”). The ’845 patent is entitled “Portable Personal Terminal for Use In A System For Handling…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Default Proof Credit Card System, Inc. v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2004
- Display Technologies, LLC v. Mechtronics Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2004