Legal Opinion
Pepitone v. Serman
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided May 7, 2002No. AC 21963PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*615 Opinion
DRANGINIS, J.
The plaintiff, James A. Pepitone, appeals from the judgment of the trial court rendered after it granted the motion for summary judgment in favor of the defendants, Jerold W. Serman and Jerold W. Serman, Inc.1 On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court improperly concluded that he could not bring his action under the accidental failure of suit statute, General Statutes § 52-592,2 and, therefore, that his action is time barred by the applicable statute of limitations. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The following facts and procedural history are relevant to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Ruddock v. BurrowesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Skibeck v. AvonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991
- Gillum v. Yale UniversityConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Kronberg v. PeacockConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
3Cited by12 opinions
- Angiolillo v. BuckmillerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- Tellar v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- Martin v. Town of WestportConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
- Lind-Larsen v. Fleet National BankConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- McKeever v. FioreConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.