Legal Opinion

Teresa Fullerton v. South King County Multi-Service Center, Inc., a Domestic Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 8, 1995No. 94-35871Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

72 F.3d 135

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.

Teresa FULLERTON, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

SOUTH KING COUNTY MULTI-SERVICE CENTER, INC., a domestic

corporation, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 94-35871.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted Nov. 15, 1995.

Decided Dec. 8, 1995.

Before: WRIGHT, FERNANDEZ and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. TurketteSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Coffy v. Republic Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Boise Cascade Corporation Pope & Talbot, Inc. James River Ii, Inc. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Northwest Coalition for Alternatives to Pesticides (Ncap) v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Citizens for a Better Environment v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, the Santa Clara Valley Nonpoint Source Dischargers, Respondent-Intervenor. Northwest Coalition for Alternatives v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  4. Trusteed Funds, Inc. v. DaceyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1947
  5. Marion J. Imel v. Laborers Pension Trust Fund for Northern CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API