Legal Opinion
Eagle Pipe & Supply, Inc. v. Amerada Hess Corp.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided September 8, 2010No. 2009-CA-0298PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TERRI F. LOVE, Judge.
|! This appeal arises from the sale of land to the plaintiff, who later discovered that the land was allegedly contaminated with radioactive material. The plaintiff sought relief against the former landowners and the oil and trucking companies allegedly responsible for the contamination. The trial court granted the oil and trucking companies’ exceptions of no right of action. We find that the trial court did not err, as the plaintiff has no right of action against the oil and trucking companies and affirm.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
On April 22, 1988, Eagle…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Carter v. HaygoodSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2005
- Badeaux v. Southwest Computer Bureau, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2006
- Industrial Companies, Inc. v. DurbinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2003
- Martin v. Heritage Manor SouthSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2001
- Prados v. South Central Bell Telephone CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1976
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Eagle Pipe and Supply, Inc. v. Amerada Hess CorporationSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2011
- Niemann v. Crosby Development Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2012
- Wagoner v. CHEVRON USA INC.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2010
- Duck v. Hunt Oil Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2014
- Walton v. BurnsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2013
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.