Legal Opinion

In re the Commitment of B.R.

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided March 19, 1985PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

This appeal presents the question of whether a committing court may require the Division of Mental Retardation (DMR) to provide services for a patient having a “discharged pending placement” status before the completion of administrative proceedings establishing the patient’s eligibility for such services. We conclude that the administrative proceedings must be given preference.

DMR’s contact with the patient in this case, B.R., has been of long standing. When B.R. was seven years old she was acknowledged eligible for DMR services because of her mental retardation. However, in January 1981 she…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re Applications for the Commitment of SlSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
  2. Colon v. TedescoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1973
  3. In re D. D.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1971
  4. In Re Hospitalization of Patterson and BohukNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re the Civil Commitment of U.C.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2012
  2. J.E. v. New Jersey Department of Human ServicesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1992
  3. Mr. and Mrs. JE v. STATE DHS.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API