Legal Opinion

J.E. v. New Jersey Department of Human Services

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided January 29, 1992PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

GRUCCIO, J.A.D.

This case involves the rights of a child and his parents at an administrative hearing. We conclude that the administrative hearing was adequate and that an Office of Administrative Law hearing was not necessary. We do find, however, that full disclosure was essential in this proceeding.

J.E. and E.E. are the natural parents and legal guardians (the parents) of G.E. G.E. is presently 23 years old and has a severely compromised intelligence with a long history of maladaptive, attention-seeking and destructive behavior. G.E. has been…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gloucester Cty. Welfare Bd. v. NJ CIV. SERV. COMM'N.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
  2. Barry v. Arrow Pontiac, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
  3. Public Service Electric & Gas Co. v. New Jersey Department of Environmental ProtectionSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
  4. New Jersey Ass'n for Retarded Citizens, Inc. v. New Jersey Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
  5. In Re Application of Orange Savings BankNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. JE on Behalf of GE v. StateSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
  2. Mr. and Mrs. JE v. STATE DHS.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API