Legal Opinion

Brackenbrook North Charleston, LP v. County of Charleston

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided November 28, 2005No. 26070PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The circuit court found it lacked jurisdiction to entertain Appellants’ post-remittitur request for attorneys’ fees because this Court’s mandate instructed the circuit court to dismiss the appeal without prejudice. The circuit court also declined to entertain Appellants’ “Motion to Shorten Time and Determine Compliance with Supreme Court Order.” Appellants appeal. We agree with Appellants that the circuit court had jurisdiction over the attorneys’ fees request, but hold that Appellants were not prejudiced by the circuit court’s ruling since they are not entitled to attorneys’ fees here, and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Owners Insurance v. ClaytonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005
  2. Petition of CrumSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1941
  3. Brackenbrook North Charleston, LP v. County of CharlestonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2004
  4. McDowell v. South Carolina Department of Social ServicesCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1989

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Beatty v. RawskiDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2015
  2. Harleysville Mutual Insurance v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API