Legal Opinion

Monarch Insurance Company of Ohio v. Rippy

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 9, 1962No. 39346PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

IRWIN, Justice.

E. C. Rippy and Curtis Mae Rippy, husband and wife, commenced this action against Monarch Insurance Company of Ohio to recover on two insurance policies. One policy covered their dwelling and the other policy covered the contents thereof, and the damages sustained were by reason of freezing and bursting water pipes. Trial was to the court without a jury and the insurance company appeals from a judgment in favor of the Rippys.

INSURANCE COMPANY’S GROUNDS AND CONTENTIONS IN DENYING LIABILITY

The insurance company’s principal ground for denying liability is that the insured dwelling…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Foley v. Sonoma County Farmers' Mutual Fire InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Mid-Central Towing Co. v. National Bank of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
  3. Republic Ins. Co. v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
  4. Forsythe v. BradshawSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. KMC Leasing, Inc. v. Rockwell-Standard Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000
  2. Brunson v. MID-WESTERN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANYSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
  3. Estate of Luster v. Allstate InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
  4. Hemenway v. American Casualty Co. of ReadingDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1963
  5. Antonio v. General Outdoor Advertising Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API