Legal Opinion

Latzoni v. City of Garfield

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 25, 1956PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Heher, J.

These are actions in tort for “active wrongdoing” laid to the City of Garfield and for the allegedly concurring negligence of the New York, Susquehanna and Western Railroad Company, Inc. and D. Stamato and Company, Inc. in relation to the use of “the public way” known as Division Avenue, in Garfield, “adjacent to and over the tracks, right of way and grade crossing of the defendant” railroad, “thus bringing about a dangerous and unsafe condition in the public way,” whereby the plaintiffs all suffered personal injury and Latzoni property damage…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lehigh Valley Railroad v. Board of Public Utility CommissionersSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  2. Wagner v. T., P. W. R. R.Illinois Supreme Court · 1933

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Hartman v. City of BrigantineNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
  2. Genovay v. FoxNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
  3. Aversa v. Public Service Elec. & Gas Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1982
  4. Caltavuturo v. PassaicNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1973
  5. Farkas v. Middlesex Board of FreeholdersNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API