Legal Opinion
United States v. Doherty
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided June 2, 1987No. Crim. A. 86-240-YPublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
YOUNG, District Judge.
On May 7, 1987, the jury returned its verdict in the above-captioned matter after a seventeen week trial. As soon as the verdict had been returned, News Group Boston, Inc. (the “Herald”) and the Globe Newspaper Company (the “Globe”) came before the Court seeking to intervene at the post-verdict stage of this criminal prosecution in order to gain access to the names and addresses of the jury for the purpose of conducting post-verdict interviews. The jurors’ names and addresses had been impounded during the course of the trial and were known only to…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Sheppard v. MaxwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Branzburg v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Riverside Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- United States v. AntarCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- In Re Globe Newspaper Company, United States of America v. Edmund M. Hurley, Appeal of Globe Newspaper CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- State ex rel. Beacon Journal Publishing Co. v. BondOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- Gannett Co., Inc. v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1990
- Forum Communications Co. v. PaulsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.