Shanklin v. Gray
California Supreme Court
Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of the Gity and. County of San Francisco granting a new trial. Eugene R. Garber, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Haynes, C.
This action was brought to recover the sum of one thousand dollars liquidated"damages, and costs of suit, under the provisions of an act of the legislature of this state, approved April 23, 1880 (Stats. 1880, p. 134, Civ. Code, Deering’s ed., 148,149), requiring the directors of mining corporations formed under the laws of this state to make and cause to be made and posted in the •office of the company, certain statements and reports.
The defendants were directors of the Gray Eagle Mining Company, a corporation, at the time the alleged •cause of action arose, and the plaintiff was…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Eyre v. HarmonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Loveland v. GarnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Schofield v. DorayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
3Cited by4 opinions
- Price v. Sixth District Agricultural Assn.California Supreme Court · 1927
- Silva v. Reclamation District No. 1001California Court of Appeal · 1919
- Ball v. TolmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Jacoby v. PeckCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913