Inman & Carr v. Strattan & Snodgrass
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
CASE 42 — PETITION ORDINARY APPEALS PROM JEFFERSON COURT OF COMMON PLEAS. CITED— Story on Partnership, sec. 432. CITED— 3 Met., 305; Barbaroux vs. Waters. Civil Code, sees. 254, 242, 243, 290. 2-Met., 445; Iiazelrigg vs. Donaldson. 2 Met., 209; Bell vs. Western River I. and W. Co. 4 Met-., 118; Duncan vs. Wichliffe.
1Opinion of the Court
JUDGE HARDIN
demveked the opinion of the court:
The appellees having brought an action against W. S. Inman, James Carr, and others, on a bill of exchange for nine hundred and forty-five dollars, on the 8th of November, 1867, sued out an attachment in the action against the property of said Inman and Carr, on the alleged ground that they were about to remove their property, or a material part thereof, out of this State, not leaving enough therein to satisfy the plaintiffs’ claim, or the claims of the defendants’ creditors; and the order of attachment was forthwith levied on the steamboat B. L.…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Hazelrigg v. DonaldsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1859
3Cited by9 opinions
- Passow & Sons v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.California Supreme Court · 1917
- Moffitt v. GarrettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Rachelman v. SkinnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
- Fox v. MackenzieNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1890
- Hundley v. FilbertSupreme Court of Missouri · 1880
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.